Introduction

Microlensing events are most frequently detected in crowded star fields, where there are substantial populations of sources and foreground lensing objects.
Unfortunately, the density of the stars can result in blending, with the Point Spread Functions (PSFs) of stars overlap. This is discussed in detail in blending.

Blended light from nearby stars can lead to degeneracies in two cases, described by Woźniac and Paczyński (1997).

Large impact parameters

Recall that \(A_{\rm tot} = \frac{u^{2}+2}{u\sqrt{u^{2} + 4}}\), where the impact parameter u is given by \(u^{2}(t) = u_{0}^{2} + \left ( \frac{t - t{0}}{t_{0}} \right )^{2}\), reaching a minimum of \(u_{0}\) at \(t_{0}\). For a source star of unlensed flux, \(F_{s,0}\), the magnified flux as a function of time is given by \(F_{s}(t) = F_{s,0} A(t)\). Here, the baseline flux (before and after the event) measured from the blended stars, \(F_{0}\), is a combination of flux from the source and other stars.

Where \(u_{0}\gg1\), the expression for magnification becomes \(A \approx = 1 + \frac{2}{u^{4}} = 1 + \frac{2}{[u_{0}^{2} + (t/t_{E})^{2}]^{2}}\), where \(t_{0}\) = 0.

Using these equations, we can derive an expression for the ratio between the source and total flux in the limit where \(u_{0} \gg 1\).

\(\frac{F(t)}{F_{0}} = (1 - f_{s}) + f_{s} \left( 1 + \frac{2}{(u_{0}^{2} + (t/t_{E})^{2})^{2}} \right) = 1 + \frac{2 f_{s}}{(u_{0}^{2} + (t/t_{E})^{2})^{2}}\), where \(f_{s}\) is the fraction of the measured light coming from the source.

Woźniac & Paczyński demonstrated that it is possible to substitute

\(f_{s}^{\prime} = f_{s}C^{4}, u_{0}^{\prime} = u_{0} C, t_{E}^{\prime} = t_{E} C^{-1}\) where C is an arbitrary positive constant into the equation above and still obtain the same expression for the flux ratio.

This means that there is a degeneracy between blended flux, impact parameter and the Einstein crossing time. The additional flux makes the event brighter at baseline than the true source alone, and effectively means that the event can appear to have a longer tE and lower impact parameter than it actually does.

Comparison of degenerate blended and non-blended lightcurves
Comparison of degenerate blended and non-blended lightcurves [R.A.Street]

An important aspect to note here is that although formally this degeneracy affects events with impact parameters greater than 1.0, in practise it is significant even for \(u_{0}<1.0\).

Heavy blending

The second instance where blending can cause degeneracies is when the source is faint compared with the total flux from its blended neighbors (i.e. \(f_{s} \ll 1\)). This is a common scenario in the crowded star fields of the Galactic bulge. We can only detect lensing in such cases when the peak magnification is high (and \(u_{0}\) is small), that is \(A \approx 1 + u^{-1}\).

Comparison of lightcurves with no and heavy blending
Comparison of lightcurves with no and heavy blending [R.A.Street]

In this case, the flux magnification becomes:

\[\frac{F(t)}{F_{0}} = 1 + \frac{f_{s}}{(u_{0}^{2} + (t/t_{0})^{2})^{1/2}}.\]

Once again we can explore the behaviour by substituting the main parameters for values multiplied by a common constant:

\[f_{s}^{\prime} = f_{s} C, u_{0}^{\prime} = u_{0} C, t_{0}^{\prime} = t_{0} C^{-1}.\]

This recovers the same expression as above, demonstrating the degeneracy as illustrated in the plot above. This implies that heavy blending of a source can effectively “mask” the true magnification and Einstein timescale.